Case studies highlight and bring our standards, guidelines and policy decisions to life by presenting short, realistic situations where you will have the opportunity to assess, analyze, discuss and strategize a best outcome utilizing your knowledge and experience.
If you have any questions or feedback please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Wendy decides to use her mobile phone to take a picture of John’s ulcer. She can then email the photo to her office computer and print a copy for John’s chart. That way, any nurse doing John’s dressing while she's away can compare the ulcer’s appearance over time. Wendy turns her phone on and takes a photo of the ulcerated area. At the sound, John glances up from his book, but doesn't say anything. She gives John a reassuring smile and dresses the ulcer according to the new protocol.
Despite Wendy’s good intentions, her actions breached John’s privacy. She neither explained her intention to John, nor obtained his consent to take the photo and to share it with her colleagues. Some might think that John’s silence implied consent. In fact, that’s not the case. It is important to not assume that when John did not say anything about having the photo taken, that he agreed with Wendy’s actions.
Wendy had a professional responsibility to ensure that she discussed her reasons for wanting to take a picture of the wound and to make certain that John consented to the photograph and how Wendy was planning to share it. By not obtaining John’s consent, Wendy acted inappropriately. She infringed on John’s privacy by taking a photo of his leg ulcer without his consent. Additionally, Wendy also breached her employer policy by using her personal phone to store client information.
While Wendy’s intent was to support continuity of care for John, she needed to make sure that she followed the Practice Standards for Regulated Members and legal processes to obtain information. This includes: